Sasha Latypova is a Soviet expat. A brief background describes her experience as an ex-pharma/biotech professional with 25 years experience in clinical trials, clinical technologies, and regulatory approvals. She owned/managed several contract research organizations, worked for 60+ pharma companies worldwide, and interacted with FDA as part of a scientific industry consortium on improving cardiac safety assessments in clinical trials. In her own words: “I am a retired pharmaceutical R&D executive. I worked in pharma clinical trials and ran several clinical research organizations working for 60+ pharmas worldwide. My clients included Pfizer, J&J, AstraZeneca and many other large and smaller companies. I also worked with the FDA and helped my clients prepare regulatory data submissions. I have an MBA degree from Dartmouth. Regarding bioweapons, all of this is based on me reading publicly available information – there are numerous DOD and academic studies, reports, and textbooks on this topic available online.”
In Oct 2022, Latypova observed in C-19 Injections, Regulatory and Manufacturing Fraud [PDF of slides presented]:
The intentional part—it’s fully intentional. But they ask me is it depopulation or genocide? I can’t get into the head of a criminal. Nobody can. So, the purpose of why they’re doing this, I don’t know. But I know for sure it’s intentional. That’s what the data shows and that’s what their behavior shows and all the documents. Of course all these government officials in CDC and FDA and NIH, they all know. They all know how many people have died. They have great data to follow it. They’ve known it since day one. They followed thousands of deaths and they’re under no confusion about this. So the fact that they continue is just intentional.
The injurious and lethal consequences of the experimental injections are treated as unthinkable by unelected public health officials.
In The Canaries in the Human DNA Mine, Julian Gillespie (LLB, BJuris, 8 Mar 2023) identifies and analyzes the criminal intent of changing human DNA
Abstract:
Decades of sophisticated and detailed legislation created to safeguard Humanity from exposure to Genetically Modified Organisms, was ignored or legislated away in an instant when SARS-CoV-2 arrived. This was done with intention, and not for the good of Humanity. The LNP-modRNA ‘vaccines’ always fulfilled the legal definitions for being categorised as Genetically Modified Organisms. Pfizer, Moderna, and regulators all knew this. The claims by Pfizer and Moderna repeated by regulators and complicit politicians that modRNAs do not enter the cell nucleus, and reverse transcribe into the Human Genome, were lies, made knowingly. Over four decades of scientific knowledge that started with a Nobel Prize only pointed to modRNAs integrating into the Human Genome. The WHO and regulatory experts everywhere did not want to inform the global population about these facts.
David Hughes analyzes What is in the so-called COVID-19 “Vaccines”? Part 1: Evidence of a Global Crime Against Humanity (International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research 3 Sep 2022):
Abstract
Between July 2021 and August 2022, evidence of undisclosed ingredients in the COVID-19 “vaccines” was published by at least 26 researchers/research teams in 16 different countries across five continents using spectroscopic and microscopic analysis. Despite operating largely independently of one another, their findings are remarkably similar and highlight the clear and present danger that the world’s population has been lied to regarding the contents of the COVID-19 “vaccines”. This raises grave questions about the true purpose of the dangerous experimental injections that have so far been shot into 5.33 billion people (over two thirds of the human race), including children, apparently without their informed consent regarding the contents. Surprise findings include sharp-edged geometric structures, fibrous or tube-like structures, crystalline formations, “microbubbles”, and possible self-assembling nanotechnology. The blood of people who have received one or more COVID-19 “vaccines” appears, in case after case, to contain foreign bodies and to be seriously degraded, with red blood cells typically in Rouleaux formation. Taken together, these 26 studies make a powerful case for the full force of scientific investigation to be brought to bear on the COVID-19 “vaccine” contents. If the findings of these 26 studies are confirmed, then the political implications are nothing short of revolutionary: a global crime against humanity has been committed, in which every government, every regulator, every establishment media organization, and all the professions have been complicit.
Daniel Santiago is a pharmacist in Orlando, Florida. Here he summarizes A Partial Answer to the Question Posed by David A. Hughes, PhD, in the Article: “What is in the so-called COVID-19 ‘Vaccines’? Part 1: Evidence of a Global Crime Against Humanity” (International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research 3 Sep 2022):
Abstract
In this comment, originally thought of as a “Letter to the Editor”, I want to address the opening question posed by David A. Hughes in the immediately preceding entry in this journal: “What is in the so-called COVID-19 ‘Vaccines’?” The views from under the microscope, ordinary light or electron scanning, all show undisclosed foreign objects that seem to activate themselves and aggregate into complexes that disrupt blood flow in all organ systems. With the spectral analysis using electron microscopy it is possible to determine the specific elements and relative quantities of the elements in those foreign entities. In this comment, I want to focus on the absence of certain elements that are universally present in the proteins of naturally occurring life forms from humans right down to bacteria and even the proteins formed from viruses. What is missing from the spectral analyses of the foreign elements in the main COVID-19 vaccines, Pfizer and Moderna for certain, and probably also missing from the other experimental products being widely distributed that are known to contain foreign aggregates of strange materials similar to those found in the Moderna and Pfizer injections, are the elements nitrogen and phosphorous. This is revealing because all natural DNA, RNA, and their protein products contain those missing elements. Nitrogen for protein synthesis and phosphorus for DNA, RNA, and energy transfer. Therefore, their absence from the foreign structures seen under many different microscopes in all of the COVID-19 so-called “vaccines” that have been examined, and also found in blood samples of persons injected with the Moderna and Pfizer concoctions, proves that these intentionally manufactured self-assembling components, built mainly from carbon-based materials used in computing and super-conductors, are connected with the avant-guard evolutionary theory and experimentation with what is known as XNA, Xeno (Greek for “foreign”), Nucleic Acid. Most of the relevant information is behind significant paywalls in esoteric journals specializing in this peculiar branch of highly theoretical and experimental chemistry. To leap to the bottom-line of my urgent comment on the Hughes’ paper, the edgy modified mRNA with N1-methylpseudouridine (Ψ) replacing the naturally occurring RNA nucleotide uridine (U) at least 728 times in each one of the 30 billion mRNA molecules in each of the Pfizer injections is an exmplary XNA. In this comment I want to explain why the inclusion of such an XNA may be the clue that leads to the unraveling of the already devastating and potentially exterminating impact of the ongoing COVID-19 experiment on the human race.
Dr. Roger Hodkinson is a general practitioner and a medical specialist in pathology, a national pathology board examiner, and laboratory accreditation inspector. A graduate of Cambridge University and a Fellow of the College of American Pathologists (FCAP) and the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada (FRCPC), he began voicing his concerns about our upside-down world in 2020. In the following 25 Aug 2022 recording, Why Is No One Talking About Sudden Dead Doctor Syndrome?, he speaks with Laura-Lynn Tyler Thompson (segment begins at 44:17 and runs to 1:23:56; mp3: 39:39). The following excerpts focus on the very future promulgation of the human species in terms of fertility and infertility in both women and men.
This has to stop, not just for children, but for the entire population. It’s the most catastrophic intervention in medical history. It’s at that scale of enormity…. As a pathologist with a very full, extensive career, I have opened up hundreds of uteruses that have come from the operating room. The gynecologists take it out. They don’t open it up. We do as pathologists in order to look at the pathology, to take sections and look at them microscopically.
I can tell you that the endometrium is the lushest, most fragile tissue in the entire human body. You can put your finger in it, just like you can put your finger in the brain. It’s extremely delicate and it’s meant to be so as a nurturing environment for the develop—the fertilized ovum that comes down the fallopian tube and implants into the endometrium. The blood vessels in the endometrium are exquisitely fragile. Witness, how easy it is to make them bleed; a woman’s menstrual period every month.
Those vessels are all lined by a receptor for the spike protein. The receptor is called the ACE2 receptor. So it should come as no surprise to hear of all these menstrual abnormalities that are happening after vaccination. Because the spike protein being massively overproduced in some women, hones in on many blood vessels, including the blood vessels in the lining of the uterus causing them to thrombose or bleed. Hence the reason for the menstrual abnormalities post vaccination, so called.But that’s merely the backdrop. That fertilized ovum that’s traveling down, hoping to be received by welcoming, lush endometrium, suddenly finds itself landing in a space that’s been devastated. Not at all welcoming. And so the likelihood of that ovum implanting and having a successful pregnancy is much lower. And that’s one of the principle reasons I think why we are seeing a decline in fertility for women.
The other reason is that the spike protein—the antibodies directed against the spike protein—which is the intended consequence of this clot shot, those antibodies against the spike protein happen to cross-react to a particular protein in the placenta called syncytin. And that attack against the developing placenta would be another reason for the developing fetus not to survive.
But the story gets much, much more serious than that. Just a digression for a minute. Before getting into the developing female fetus. Spermatozoa counts have been dropping internationally for decades for reasons that are unclear. But we do know that superimposed upon that, there’s an additional 15% reduction in the concentration of spermatozoa following injection with the clot shot…. So that compounds the problem of course of infertility because that’s only the count by the way. It doesn’t reflect the actual viability and metabolism of an individual spermmatozoon. It’s simply the crude count. There may well be other functional abnormalities that are not being studied.
Anyway, to get to the big point, the big point is this: we know from the freedom of information requested for the Japanese as a result of the Pfizer [Biodistribution Report] submission there. That was done by Dr. Byram Bridle out of Guelph. We do know that that study that was presented to the Japanese and released very reluctantly by Pfizer, showed that nanoparticles without the mRNA inside them, just the naked particles, when injected into rats, those particles honed on the rat ovaries to a very significant degree. The third highest concentration in the rat was in the rat ovaries.
Now, baby girls are born with all the eggs they’re ever going to have in their entire life. They don’t make any more when they’re born. It’s about a million or so. And so each one of those ova is incredibly precious. So there could be an inflammatory attack going on against the ovary of a developing female fetus because we also know that nanoparticles of that size are well known to pass through what we call the placental barrier, the thing that keeps the baby safe from all kinds of noxious things. So these nanoparticles from the clot shot that are known to be inflammatory and known to concentrate in rat ovaries—by the way, not studied in humans, conveniently—despite knowing that those nanoparticles known to be inflammatory are getting through the placenta and could be, again, not studied, could be attacking the ovary of the developing female fetus. Translation: this may not be simply an effect on fertility. It could be causing infertility only manifest 20 years later when that little girl becomes of reproductive age. This is the scale. This is the scale of stuff that is still not studied, things with gigantic consequences. The only saving grace is that it seems, at least in the states, that parents are smartening up and are choosing not to get their children vaccinated.
Two observable facts have helped some people see through the fog of this war, and continue to help more people see through it all the time:
- FDA and other governments’ drug regulatory agencies have not withdrawn authorizations or approvals of the drugs, devices and protocols yet, despite millions of injuries and deaths experienced by recipients of the products during the initial deployment phase (January to November 2020, including the fraudulent clinical trials for the injections) and since the general deployment of the injections that began in December 2020. If the products were intended for medicinal, healing or protective purposes, and were subject to regulation governing research and development, production and use of medical drugs and devices, FDA and its counterparts in other countries would have stopped the programs as soon as the injuries and deaths became apparent. Instead, they have refused to even answer the question: “What is the stopping condition?”
- Independent third-party verification of vial contents is prohibited under the terms of the DOD-mediated contracts between purchasing governments and manufacturing corporations. In typical drug regulation frameworks, according to Sasha Latypova, independent researchers can and do purchase products from manufacturers to verify that contents match labels and corroborate or disprove claims about safety and efficacy.
